Tag Cloud

What is a tag cloud?

Current tags: Clear current tags
View full tag cloud
Advertisement
Q

Is a low level laser light brush (Hairmax) effective for treating hair loss?

Associated tags: alopecia, androgenic alopecia, Dermatology, laser therapy

Question DetailsView Comments (1)
A

ANSWER

provided by Trip / NLH
Search
Moderate
Appraisal
Moderate
Confidence
Poor

Answer Rating key

search strong
appraisal weak
confidence moderate

Question answered:03/06/08

In 2004 Cutis published ‘Hair Loss Remedies—Separating Fact From Fiction’ [1], this reported:

 

“Laser Light Therapy—Low-intensity laser light therapy has been shown to be effective in promoting wound healing and in improving circulation. For these reasons, some hair loss treatment centers are offering the use of lasers for treating alopecia in both men and women. To date, there are no known studies looking at the efficacy of these lasers for treating hair loss. The use of low-intensity laser light for treating alopecia is FDA approved for safety only, not for efficacy.”

 

A 2007 review [2] reported:

 

“This paper is a consensus of hair loss experts on the current scientific data, mechanisms of action, safety, protocols and recommendations regarding laser/light treatment for hair loss. The authors believe that, while seemingly safe, there are no controlled, peer-reviewed studies validating current devices for hair loss....”

 

We found some small studies looking at lasers for alopecia areata [e.g. 3, 4], these were small and were not randomised controlled trials.  But I imagine the question refers to androgenic alopecia and therefore these studies are invariably superfluous.

 

References

1) http://www.permanente.net/homepage/kaiser/pdf/45577.pdf
2) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17457763
3) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16581682
4) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18076615
 


DISCLAIMER: TRIPanswers is a collection of clinical questions and answers.  Each provider will have their own methodology in answering questions and these are likely not to be as rigorous as systematic review.  If you have any doubt as to the implications of this contact the Q&A Service Provider for further information. This document is presented for information purposes only. This document cannot and should not be used as a basis of diagnosis or choice of treatment, and is in no way intended to replace professional medical care or attention by a qualified practitioner. TRIPanswers and TRIP Database Ltd are not responsible or liable for, directly or indirectly, ANY form of damage whatsoever resulting from the use/misuse of information contained in or implied by this document.  Also, ensure you have read the terms and conditions for using the site.

Need to search for more evidence?

Help us improve this answer

Leave comments or suggestions below

Disclaimer:

TRIP will review each comment and will only publish those we feel will enhance a particular answer.  As a result of the review process there will be a delay between submission and publication of accepted comments.