Tag Cloud

What is a tag cloud?

Current tags: Clear current tags
View full tag cloud
Advertisement
Q

In patients with proven paroxysmal atrial fibrillation without abnormalities on ECHO, is there any benefit using warfarin rather than aspirin for anticoagulation?

Associated tags: anticoagulation, aspirin, atrial fibrillation, Cardiovascular disease, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, warfarin

Question DetailsView Comments (0)
A

ANSWER

provided by Trip / NLH
Search
Moderate
Appraisal
Moderate
Confidence
Moderate

Answer Rating key

search strong
appraisal weak
confidence moderate

Question answered:09/05/06 Warning! this question is over two years old.

PRODIGY, in their guideline on AF devote a section to paroxysmal AF, which discusses management.  This is too large to reproduce here so we recommend you read the article via the URL in the reference section.  However, we’ll reproduce a few points below:

 

“The risk of thromboembolism is probably the same as that for permanent AF, and the same criteria for antithrombotic treatment apply (A).”

 

“Treatment may not be necessary if symptomatic episodes are mild, infrequent, and short. The benefits of treatment have to be balanced against the risks of long-term anti-arrhythmic medication”

 

Antithrombotic treatment

 

There is an 18-fold increase in the risk of thromboembolism in people with atrial fibrillation (AF) and rheumatic mitral stenosis. Despite the few randomized trials carried out, it is accepted that such people should be treated with warfarin (C).

 

AF increases the risk of thromboembolism by a factor of about six even in the absence of mitral valve disease (i.e. non-valvular AF). Warfarin, and also aspirin, have been shown to reduce the risk of stroke in these people, although the reduction is larger and more consistent with warfarin.

 

Warfarin reduces the risk of stroke by nearly two-thirds, while aspirin reduces the risk by about a fifth.
 - Note: the overall incidence of stroke is about 5% per year in people with non-valvular AF. However, there is a wide variation in risk, depending on a person's age, and the presence of any additional risk factors (e.g. hypertension, heart failure, diabetes, previous stroke, or previous transient ischaemic attack [TIA]).
 - The decision to use warfarin or aspirin should ultimately be based on the balance of an individual's overall risk of stroke compared with the risk of adverse effects.”

 

It also has a section ‘Who should receive antithrombotic prophylaxis?’

 

References

1) PRODIGY. Atrial fibrillation. 2003 (http://www.prodigy.nhs.uk/ProdigyKnowledge/Guidance/WholeGuidanceView.aspx?GuidanceId=37285)


DISCLAIMER: TRIPanswers is a collection of clinical questions and answers.  Each provider will have their own methodology in answering questions and these are likely not to be as rigorous as systematic review.  If you have any doubt as to the implications of this contact the Q&A Service Provider for further information. This document is presented for information purposes only. This document cannot and should not be used as a basis of diagnosis or choice of treatment, and is in no way intended to replace professional medical care or attention by a qualified practitioner. TRIPanswers and TRIP Database Ltd are not responsible or liable for, directly or indirectly, ANY form of damage whatsoever resulting from the use/misuse of information contained in or implied by this document.  Also, ensure you have read the terms and conditions for using the site.

Need to search for more evidence?

Help us improve this answer

Leave comments or suggestions below

Disclaimer:

TRIP will review each comment and will only publish those we feel will enhance a particular answer.  As a result of the review process there will be a delay between submission and publication of accepted comments.